Base Degradation Study and Method
Development of Rivaroxaban by
RP-HPLC in bulk
Kasad
Pinaz A.*, K.S. Muralikrishna
Shree Dhanvantary Pharmacy College, Department of Quality
assurance, Kim, Surat (India)
*Corresponding Author E-mail:- pinazkasad@yahoo.in
ABSTRACT:
A simple,
precise and accurate HPLC method has been developed and validated for assay of Rivaroxaban. An isocratic separation was achieved using a phenomenex C18 (250×4.6 mm, 5μm), 100°A particle size
columns with a flow rate of 1 ml/min and using a PDA detector to monitor the elute at 250 nm. The mobile phase consisted of Methanol:
Acetronitrile (50:50, v/v). The method was validated
for specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy and robustness. The method was
linear over the concentration range of 20-100 µg/ml (r2=
0.99995).The Drug was subjected to base degradation. The method was found to be
robust and suitable for routine analysis of Rivaroxaban.
Degradation products resulting from the stress studies did not interfere with
the detection of Rivaroxaban and the method is thus
stability-indicating.
KEYWORDS: Rivaroxaban, Oral anticoagulant, 250 nm, stability
indicating method, base Degradation.
INTRODUCTION [1-6]
Introduction (1-7)
Anticoagulants are often called blood thinners. They help prevent
blood clots from forming and growing and reduce your risk for heart
attack, stroke and blockages in your arteries and veins. Rivaroxaban is an oral anticoagulant invented and
manufactured by Bayer; in a number of countries it is marketed as Xarelto. (1) In the United States, it is
marketed by Janssen Pharmaceutical. (2) It is the first available
orally active direct factor Xa inhibitor. The effects last 8–12 hours, but factor Xa activity does not return to normal within 24 hours so
once-daily dosing is possible.(3-4) There is no specific way to
reverse the anticoagulant effect of Rivaroxaban in
the event of a major bleeding event, unlike warfarin.
Rivaroxaban is an oxazolidinone derivative
optimized for inhibiting both free Factor Xa and
Factor Xa bound in the Prothrombinase
complex.(5)
It is a highly selective direct
Factor Xa inhibitor with
oral bioavailability and rapid onset of action. Inhibition of Factor Xa interrupts the intrinsic and extrinsic pathway of the blood coagulation cascade, inhibiting
both thrombin formation and development of thrombi. Rivaroxaban
does not inhibit thrombin (activated Factor II), and no effects on platelets have been demonstrated.(6)In
September 2008, Health Canada and European Commission granted
marketing authorization for Rivaroxaban as one
10 mg tablet taken once daily for the prevention of venous thromboembolism
(VTE) in patients who have
undergone elective total hip
replacement or total knee replacement surgery. It was approved by CDSCO on 30 January 2010. In December
2011 Rivaroxaban has been approved by the European
Commission for use in two new indications: prevention of stroke and systemic
embolism in adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) with one or more risk factors and
treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and prevention of recurrent DVT and
pulmonary embolism (PE) following an acute DVT in adults.
On July 1, 2011,
the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) approved Rivaroxaban for
prophylaxis of deep vein
thrombosis (DVT), which may lead
to pulmonary embolism (PE), in adults undergoing hip and
knee replacement surgery.(3) On November 4, 2011, the U.S. FDA approved Rivaroxaban
for stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial
fibrillation.(4)
Structure of Rivaroxaban
IUPAC name of Rivaroxaban is
(S)-5-chloro-N-{[2-oxo-3-[4-(3-oxomorpholin-4-yl) phenyl] oxazolidin-5 yl]methyl}thiophene-2-Carboxamide.
It’s Molecular Formula is C19H18ClN3O5 and
Molecular Mass is 435.882 g/mol. Literature survey reveals Colorimetric method(8-9), RP-HPLC method(10) and bio analytical method(11)
for estimation of Rivaroxaban. The stability of a
drug substance or drug product is defined as its capacity to remain within
established specifications, i.e. to maintain its identity, strength, quality,
and purity until the retest or expiry date. Stability testing of an active
substance or finished product provides evidence of how the quality of a drug
substance or drug product varies with time under a variety of environmental
conditions, for example temperature, humidity, and light. Knowledge from
stability studies is used in the development of manufacturing processes,
selection of proper packaging and storage conditions, and determination of
product shelf-life. There was no reported stability indicating analytical
method for analysis of Rivaroxaban in the presence of
its degradation products in pharmaceutical dosage forms. The objective of this
work was to develop a new, simple, economic, rapid, precise, and accurate
stability-indicating HPLC method for quantitative analysis of Rivaroxaban, and to validate the method in accordance with
ICH guidelines.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS:
Instruments and Reagents
A HPLC
Instrument with UV-Visible and photodiode array detector LC-2010CHT, Shimadzu,
Japan was used for the absorbance measurements. Sartorious
CP225D Analytical balance was used for weighing the samples. D120/1H,
Trans-o-sonic- Ultra Sonicator was used for
Sonication of solution. All the chemicals used were of analytical grade. Pure Rivaroxaban was procured as a gift sample from Mega Fine Pharma, Mumbai, India.
Preparation of standard stock solution (500 μg/mL)
25 mg of Rivaroxaban was weighed accurately and transferred into a
clean, dry 50 mL volumetric flask, dissolved with
sufficient volume of diluent (50:50 v/v% Methanol: acetonitrile) and volume was adjusted to 50 mL with diluent to get a
concentration of 500 μg/mL.
Selection of Wavelength
The standard
solution of Rivaroxaban was injected under the
chromatographic conditions. Detection was carried out at different wavelengths
but the best response was achieved at 250 nm with PDA detector. Therefore it
was chosen as the analytical wavelength.
Figure 1-
Selection of wavelength by PDA Detector
Selection of Mobile Phase:
The scanning of Rivaroxaban was done by preparing 50 µg/ml solution of drug
separately in combination of various solvent systems (varying the ratio and/or
nature of organic modifier), at the end of these studies acetonitrile:
Methanol (50: 50 v/v) was selected as the best mobile phase because in that
drug was showing good elution (figure-2).
Figure 2-
Chromatogram of 50 µg/ml of Rivaroxaban using studies
acetonitrile: Methanol (50: 50 v/v) as a mobile
phase.
Figure- 3 3D plot
of standard solution by PDA detector for HPLC method
Method
Validation :( 19)
The method
validation was carried out as per ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines. The following
validation parameters; linearity and range, accuracy and precision, limit of
detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ) and robustness were studied.
Linearity
The portions of 0.4 mL, 0.8 mL, 1.2 mL, 1.6 mL, and 2.0 mL of 500 μg/mL of standard stock solution of Rivaroxaban
were transferred separately to a series of 10 mL of
volumetric flasks and volume was adjusted to 10 mL
with diluent to obtain the concentrations of 20 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL, 60 μg/mL, 80 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL respectively. 20 μl of each of these standard solutions of Rivaroxaban were injected under the operating
chromatographic conditions into the system. Calibration curve was constructed
by plotting (peak areas v/s concentrations) of Rivaroxaban.
Accuracy
The accuracy of
an analytical method is the closeness of test results obtained by that method
to the true value. The accuracy of the method was determined by calculating recovery
of Rivaroxaban by the standard addition method.
Precision
I. Intraday precision
Solutions of Rivaroxaban containing 2, 6 and 12 μg/mL series were analyzed three times on the same day and %
RSD was calculated.
II. Interday
Precision
Solutions of Rivaroxaban containing 2, 6 and 12 μg/mL series were analyzed on three different days and % RSD
were calculated.
Robustness:
The robustness
of the method was established by making deliberate minor variations in the flow
rate and Temperature.
Limit of
Detection and Limit of Quantification
Purpose
LOD and the LOQ of the drug
were calculated using the following equations as per International Conference
on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines.
LOD= 3.3 X σ/S
LOD= 10 X σ/S
Where,
σ =
Standard deviation of the response
S = Slope of
calibration curve.
Base Decomposition (12-18)
Different molar
concentrations of NaOH were refluxed with Rivaroxaban at varied temperature and time period. All
samples were subjected to HPLC analysis. The initial analysis of different
stressed samples was performed on HPLC system using a C-18 column and mobile
phase composed of acetonitrile: Methanol (50: 50). It
was filtered and sonicated before use.
The injection
volume was 20 µl and the flow rate was set at 1ml/min. The detection was
carried out at 250nm.. At the end of these studies 0.1
M NaOH was used and refluxed for 1,2,4,6 hrs and 1
Day and 3 Day at RT, 40 0 C and 60 0 C in dark in order
to exclude the degradative effect of light.
Table-1 Summary of Base Degradation at RT, 40 0C and
60 0C.
Sr. No. |
TIME |
% DEGRADATION |
||
RT |
40 0C |
60 0C |
||
1 |
1 Hr |
1.76 |
5.04 |
8.323 |
2 |
2 Hrs |
3.77 |
7.25 |
12.67 |
3 |
4 Hrs |
8.68 |
17.48 |
24.59 |
4 |
6 Hrs |
15.78 |
22.43 |
32.46 |
5 |
1 Day |
26.16 |
29.99 |
42.25 |
6 |
3 Day |
35.53 |
39.97 |
47.35 |
Figure-3 Base
Degradation of 3 Day at RT
Figure 4-Base
Degradation of 3 Day at 40 0C
Figure 5 Base Degradation of 3
Day at 60 0C
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
Table-2 Regression Analysis Data
and Summary of Validation Parameters for HPLC Method.
SR. NO. |
VALIDATION PARAMETER |
RESULT |
1 |
UV detection wavelength
(nm) |
250 nm |
2 |
Linearity range (μg/mL) |
20-100 |
3 |
Standard Regression
equation |
y = 79,902.16000x +
8,662.40000 |
4 |
Correlation coefficient
(R2) |
R˛ = 0.99995 |
5 |
Precision (%RSD) Intraday (n= 9) |
0.143 (Acceptance limit:
<1) |
6 |
% Recovery (Accuracy, n =
9) |
100.85 % |
7 |
LOD (μg/mL) |
0.1277 |
8 |
LOQ (μg/mL) |
0.38726 |
9 |
Robustness Flow rate change Temperature change |
0.22 0.12 |
10 |
Assay (% Label claim) |
99.68 |
CONCLUSION:
A simple, rapid,
accurate and precise stability-indicating HPLC analytical method has been
developed and validated for the routine quantitative analysis of Rivaroxaban in API. Rivaroxaban
undergo degradation in Basic stressed condition to give four degradation
products. The degradation peak is clearly
separated from the drug peak (Resolution more than two) and hence the
method is stability Indicating
and can be applied to the analysis of routine quality control samples and
samples obtained from stability studies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors are
thankful to the Shree Dhanvantary Pharmaceutical
Research Center, Kim for providing facities to carry
out research work. We are also thankful to Mr. Prashant
Sikarwar, Dr. Vishnu Sutariya, Dr. Shroff, Mr. Vikas Tiwari and Mr. Mihir Bhatt
for their needful support.
REFERENCES:
1.
"Xarelto: Summary of Product
Characteristics". Bayer Schering Pharma AG.
2008.
2.
"FDA Approves XARELTO (Rivaroxaban
tablets) to Help Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients Undergoing Knee or
Hip Replacement Surgery". Janssen Pharmaceutica.
3.
"Bayer's Xarelto Approved in
Canada" (Press release). Bayer.
4.
"Bayer’s Novel Anticoagulant Xarelto
now also Approved in the EU". Bayer.
5.
”Discovery of the novel antithrombotic agent 5-chloro-N-({(5S)-
2-oxo-3- [4-(3-oxomorpholin-4-yl)phenyl]-1,3-oxazolidin-5- yl}methyl)thiophene- 2-carboxamide (BAY 59-7939): an oral, direct
factor Xa inhibitor"., Roehrig
S, Straub A, Pohlmann J, et al, Journal of Medicinal
Chemistry 48 (19): 5900–8.
6.
European Medicines agency (2008). “CHP Assessment Report for
Xarelto”.
7.
Center for drug evaluation and research and Clinical
pharmacology and biopharmaceutics
review(s) of Rivaroxaban
8.
P.V.V. Satyanarayana, Alavala Siva Madhavi, Department
of Chemistry. New Spectrophotometric methods for the quantitative estimation of
Rivaroxaban in formulations, International Journal of
Research and Reviews in Pharmacy and Applied science, 611-620.
9.
Job Harenberg, Roland Kramer, Christina Giese,
Svetlana Marx,Christel
Weiss, and Martin Wehling. Determination of rivaroxaban by different factor Xa
specific chromogenic substrate assays: reduction of interassay variability, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, J Thromb Thrombolysis.; 32(3): 267–271, October 2011.
10. P.V.V Satyanarayana
and Alavala Siva Madhavi. RP-HPLC method development and validation for the analysis of rivaroxaban in pharmaceutical dosage forms 2012, 2 (1),
226-231
11. Rohde G., Determination of rivaroxaban--a
novel, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor--in human
plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in
Journal of Chromatography. B, Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and
Life Sciences [2008, 872(1-2):43-50]
12. Monika Bakshi
and Saranjit Singh. Development of validated stability indicating assay
method-critical review. J.Pharm
Biomed.Anal.2002;28(6):1011-1040.
13. Singh S, Bakshi M.
Guidance on conduct of stress tests to determine inherent stability of drugs. Phrama Tech 2000; 24: 1-14.
14. Shah BP, Jain S, Prajapati KK and Mansuri NY: Stability Indicating HPLC Method Development: A
Review. Int J Pharm Res Sci.
3(9); 2978-2988
15. ICH. Guidance for Industry.Q1A Stability Testing of New Drug Substances
and Products. ICH-Q1A. 2001.
16. ICH guidelines Q1A (R2). Stability
Testing of New Drug Substances and Products (revision 2), November 2003.
17. WHO, Guidelines for Stability Testing of
Pharmaceutical Products Containing Well Established Drug Substances in
Conventional Dosage Forms, in WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for
Pharmaceutical Preparations. Technical Report Series 863, World Health
Organization, Geneva, 1996, pp. 65–79.
18. Vitthal V. Chopade. Sensitive Analytical Methods for Determination of Stability of
Drugs in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. Pharmainfonet. 2008.
19. Q2R1 ICH guidelines for analytical method
development. Available at: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_ Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q2_R1/Step4/Q2_R1__Guideline.pdf
Received on 10.06.2013 Accepted on 30.07.2013
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm. Res.
3(3): July-Sept. 2013; Page
109-113